Blue Tit

Blue Tit

Cyanistes caeruleus

Introduction

This is a colourful little bird, and a familiar garden favourite. It is also common in woodland, hedgerows, parks and gardens.

Blue Tits have distinctive blue-green and yellow plumage and a blue cap. They regularly visit garden feeders and use nest boxes. Sexes are similar but, on average, males have slightly brighter colours than females.

The Blue Tit is a common resident breeder, widespread everywhere in Britain & Ireland except the Northern Isles and parts of the Hebrides. The UK population trend is stable, with some fluctuations.

Blue Tits often form mixed flocks with other tit species, especially in winter. In natural settings, they nest in tree holes and an average of of eight to 10 eggs once, sometimes twice, a year.

You can also read more about the Blue Tit's life during breeding season on our Blue Tit diary.

  • Our Trends Explorer gives you the latest insight into how this species' population is changing.

Key Stats

Status
Common
Common
Weight
Weight
10.9g
Eggs
Eggs
8-10
BTO Records
BTO Records
11m records
Population and distribution stats for:
Population Change
Population Change
25% increase 1967–2022
Population Size
Population Size
3m Territories
Distribution Change
Distribution_change
1.4% expansion

Identification

Curated resources to aid in the identification of Blue Tit

ID Videos

This section features BTO training videos headlining this species, or featuring it as a potential confusion species.

GBW: Blue Tit and Great Tit

#BirdSongBasics: Blue Tit and Great Tit

Songs and Calls

Listen to example recordings of the main vocalisations of Blue Tit, provided by xeno-canto contributors.

Song:

Call:

Alarm call:

Begging call:

Movement

Information about Blue Tit movements and migration based on online bird portals (e.g. BirdTrack), Ringing schemes and tracking studies.

Britain & Ireland movement

View a summary of recoveries in the Online Ringing Report

Foreign locations of birds ringed or recovered in Britain & Ireland

Dots show the foreign destinations of birds ringed in Britain & Ireland, and the origins of birds ringed overseas that were subsequently recaptured, resighted or found dead in Britain & Ireland. Dot colours indicate the time of year that the species was present at the location.

  • Winter (Nov-Feb)
  • Spring (Mar-Apr)
  • Summer (May-Jul)
  • Autumn (Aug-Oct)
Foreign locations of birds ringed or recovered in Britain & Ireland

European movements

EuroBirdPortal uses birdwatcher's records, such as those logged in BirdTrack to map the flows of birds as they arrive and depart Europe. See maps for this species here.

The Eurasian-African Migration Atlas shows movements of individual birds ringed or recovered in Europe. See maps for this species here.

Biology

Lifecycle and body size information for Blue Tit, including statistics on nesting, eggs and lifespan based on BTO ringing and nest recording data.

Productivity and Nesting

Nesting timing

Average (range) fo first clutch laying dates
26 Apr (12 Apr-11 May)
Typical (exceptional) number of broods
1(2)

Egg measurements

Typical length x width
16x12 mm
Mass (% shell)
1.1g (6%)

Clutch Size

Typical number
10-8 eggs
Average ±1 standard deviation
9.06±2.14 eggs
Observed minimum and maximum
2-16 eggs

Incubation

Incubation by
Female
Typical duration
14-13 days
Observed average ±1 standard deviation
13.88±1.31 days
Observed minimum and maximum
12-16 days

Fledging

Type of chick
Altricial, downy
Typical duration
21-18 days
Observed average ±1 standard deviation
19.28±2.16 days
Minimum and maximum
15-22.5 days
N=4391, Source
Visit our Trends Explorer for trend graphs and country statistics.

Survival and Longevity

Survival is shown as the proportion of birds surviving from one year to the next and is derived from bird ringing data. It can also be used to estimate how long birds typically live.

View number ringed each year in the Online Ringing Report.

lifespan

Typical life expectancy of bird reaching breeding age
3 years with breeding typically at 1 year
Maximum age from a ringed bird
9 years, 8 months, 16 days (set in 1984)

Survival of adults

All adults
0.532±0.008
Females
0.421±0.028
Males
0.508±0.034

Survival of juveniles

All juveniles
0.379±0.009 (in first year)
Visit our Trends Explorer for trend graphs and country statistics.

Biometrics

Wing length and body weights are from live birds (source).

Wing length

Average ±1 std deviation; range and sample size in brackets.
Juvenile
62.9±1.9 mm
(60-66 mm, N=86391)
All adults
63.3±2.8 mm
(60-67 mm, N=102856)
Female
61.9±1.4 mm
(60-64 mm, N=29571)
Male
65.3±1.5 mm
(63-68 mm, N=23092)

Body weight

Average ±1 std deviation; range and sample size in brackets.
Juvenile
62.9±1.9 mm
(60-66 mm, N=86391)
All adults
63.3±2.8 mm
(60-67 mm, N=102856)
Female
61.9±1.4 mm
(60-64 mm, N=29571)
Male
65.3±1.5 mm
(63-68 mm, N=23092)
Visit our Trends Explorer for trend graphs and country statistics.

Ring Size

A

Classification, names and codes

Taxonomy, names and species codes for Blue Tit

Classification and Codes

  • Order: Passeriformes
  • Family: Paridae
  • Scientific name: Cyanistes caeruleus
  • Authority: Linnaeus, 1758
  • BTO 2-letter code: BT
  • BTO 5-letter code: BLUTI
  • Euring code number: 14620

Alternate species names

  • Catalan: mallerenga blava eurasiàtica
  • Czech: sýkora modrinka
  • Danish: Blåmejse
  • Dutch: Pimpelmees
  • Estonian: sinitihane
  • Finnish: sinitiainen
  • French: Mésange bleue
  • Gaelic: Cailleachag-ghorm
  • German: Blaumeise
  • Hungarian: kék cinege
  • Icelandic: Blámeisa
  • Irish: Meantán Gorm
  • Italian: Cinciarella
  • Latvian: zilzilite
  • Lithuanian: melynoji zyle
  • Norwegian: Blåmeis
  • Polish: modraszka (zwyczajna)
  • Portuguese: chapim-azul
  • Slovak: sýkorka belasá
  • Slovenian: plavcek
  • Spanish: Herrerillo común
  • Swedish: blåmes
  • Welsh: Titw Tomos Las
  • English folkname(s): Tom Tit

Research

Interpretation and scientific publications about Blue Tit from BTO scientists.

Causes of Change and Solutions

Causes of change

Demographic trends in breeding parameters do not suggest that increases in this species are due to improvements in breeding performance. Evidence for ecological drivers of the population increase is limited but increased provisioning in gardens and milder winters may have played a role.

Further information on causes of change

Causes of change are likely to be similar to those for Great Tit (Robinson et al. 2014). A new strain of avian pox, first recorded in 2006, affects Blue Tits less frequently than Great Tits, and is unlikely to be behind the recent downturn which has occurred across the UK including regions where the disease is yet to be recorded (Lawson et al. 2018). Food provision in gardens during winter (Plummer et al. 2019) and availability of nest boxes, which may reduce egg and nestling predation, have both increased and may have contributed to the long-term rise in population. There have been no clear changes in fledglings per breeding attempt or in survival, however, to accompany the population increase.

Interspecific competition with Great Tits and intraspecific competition may also drive population changes in Blue Tits (Gamelon et al. 2019). As both species have increased in abundance over the long-term, density-dependent effects could thus have had a greater effect on Blue Tit which might explain the shallower long-term increase compared to Great Tit. The alert prompted from CES productivity measures may be caused by more frequent wet weather in June, as downpours can affect both tit species if they occur at the wrong time during the breeding cycle; however this is speculative and further analyses would be needed to confirm it.

Information about conservation actions

The population of this common and widespread species has increased since the 1970s with minor fluctuations, hence it is not a species of concern and no conservation actions are currently required. However, it has experienced a shallow decline over the last ten years and therefore ongoing monitoring would be prudent.

Ongoing provision of garden bird food is likely to continue to benefit the Blue Tit. However, the effects are not always entirely positive and feeders may contribute to the spread of avian pox, so those providing food should ensure they follow good hygiene practices. The provision of nest boxes, both in gardens and elsewhere, is also likely to continue to benefit this species.

Publications (9)

Temporal avoidance as a means of reducing competition between sympatric species

Author: Maziarz, M., Broughton, R.K., Beck, K.B., Robinson, R.A. & Sheldon, B.C.

Published: 2023

Human activities modify the availability of natural resources for other species, including birds, and may alter the relationships between them. The provision of supplementary food at garden feeding stations, for example, might favour some species over others and change the competitive balance between them. This paper investigates the behavioural responses to competition of the Marsh Tit, a species that is subordinate to both the Blue Tit and the Great Tit.

24.05.23

Papers

View this paper online

Evidence that rural wintering populations supplement suburban breeding populations

Author: Hanmer, H.J., Dadam, D. & Siriwardena, G.M.

Published: 2022

Urban areas can and do hold significant populations of birds, but we know surprisingly little about how these populations are connected with those present within the wider countryside. It has been suggested that the populations using these different habitats may be linked through seasonal movements, with individuals breeding in rural areas moving into urban sites during the winter months to exploit the supplementary food provided at garden feeding stations. However, little work has been done to test this hypothesis.

24.11.22

Papers Bird Study

View this paper online

The effects of a decade of agri-environment intervention in a lowland farm landscape on population trends of birds and butterflies

Author: Redhead, J.W., Hinsley, S.A., Botham, M.S., Broughton, R.K., Freeman, S.N., Bellamy, P.E., Siriwardena, G., Randle, Z., Nowakowski, M., Heard, M.S. & Pywell, R.F.

Published: 2022

Food production and wildlife conservation are often thought of as incompatible goals, and it is rare that conservation studies consider both economics and long-term changes in ecology. However, a decade-long study at a commercial arable farm in Buckinghamshire has found that agri-environment schemes significantly increased local bird and butterfly populations without damaging food production, offering hope for the UK’s farmland birds and butterflies. 

01.08.22

Papers

Effects of winter food provisioning on the phenotypes of breeding blue tits

Author: Plummer, K.E., Bearhop, S., Leech, D.I., Chamberlain, D.E., Blount, J.D.

Published: 2018

Our understanding of the impact of feeding wild birds is far from complete, but we are beginning to unravel the effects of providing foods at garden feeding stations. An important area of research has been to examine how supplementary foods shape populations through its impacts in individuals.

24.04.18

Papers

Tritrophic phenological match-mismatch in space and time

Author: Burgess M.D., Smith K.W., Evans K.L., Leech D., Pearce-Higgins J.W., Branston C.J., Briggs K., Clark J.R., du Feu C.R., Lewthwaite K., Nager R.G., Sheldon B.C., Smith J.A., Whytock R.C., Willis S.G., Phillimore A.B.

Published: 2018

The increasing temperatures associated with a changing climate may disrupt ecological systems, including by affecting the timing of key events. If events within different trophic levels are affected in different ways then this can lead to what is known as phenological mismatch. But what is the evidence for trophic mismatch, and are there spatial or temporal patterns within the UK that might point to mismatch as a driver of regional declines in key insect-eating birds?

23.04.18

Papers

A method to evaluate the combined effect of tree species composition and woodland structure on indicator birds

Author: Dondina, O., Orioli. V., Massimino, D., Pinoli, G. & Bani, L.

Published: 2015

Providing quantitative management guidelines is essential for an effective conservation of forest-dependent animal communities. Traditional forest practices at the stand scale simultaneously alter both physical and floristic features with a negative effect on ecosystem processes. Thus, we tested and proposed a method to define forestry prescriptions taking into account the combined effect of woodland structure and tree species composition on the presence of four bird indicator species (Marsh Tit Poecile palustris, European Nuthatch Sitta europaea, Short-toed Tree-creeper Certhya brachydactyla and Blue Tit Cyanistes caeruleus). The study was carried out in Lombardy (Northern Italy), from 2002 to 2005. By using a stratified cluster sampling design, we recorded Basal Area, one hundred tree trunk diameters at breast height (DBH) and tree species in 160 sampling plots, grouped in 23 sampling areas. In each plot we also performed a bird survey using the point count method. We analyzed data using Multimodel Inference and Model Averaging on Generalized Linear Mixed Models, with species presence/absence as the response variable, sampling area as a random factor and forest covariates as fixed factors. In order to test our method, we compared it with other two traditional approaches, which consider structural and tree floristic variables separately. Model comparison showed that our method performed better than traditional ones, in both the evaluation and validation processes. Based on our main results, in deciduous mixed forest where the exploitation demand is limited, we recommend maintaining at least 65 trees/ha with DBH>45cm. In particular, we advise keeping 70 trees/ha with DBH>50cm in chestnut forests and 300 trees/ha with DBH 20–30cm in oak forests. Conversely, in more exploited oak forests, we advise maintaining at least 670 trees/ha with DBH 15–30cm in chestnut forests and 100 trees/ha with DBH 10–15cm.

01.04.15

Papers

More Evidence

More evidence from Conservation Evidence.com

Partners

Birdfacts is based on data collected by volunteers participating in surveys that are organised and funded by BTO, RSPB, Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, JNCC and other partners.
Find a Species

Search by common or scientific name

Or view the alphabetical list of UK bird species