Coot

Coot

Fulica atra
Coot, Richard Jackson

Introduction

This resident waterbird is widely distributed across Britain & Ireland, though absent from upland areas and much of western England and Wales.

Largely herbivorous in its diet, the Coot is a bottom feeder, seizing plant material and returning to the surface to eat it. Because of this, it is more commonly found on our shallower waterbodies. Although not adverse to running water, most Coot are to be found on lakes and larger ponds.

During the winter months, cold weather movements see our resident birds joined by individuals from further east. At this time of the year, Coot may also be seen grazing on short grass close to favoured waterbodies.

  • Our Trends Explorer gives you the latest insight into how this species' population is changing.
Coot, Richard Jackson

Key Stats

Status
Common
Common
Eggs
Eggs
5-7
BTO Records
BTO Records
1.5m records
Population and distribution stats for:
Population Change
Population Change
83% increase 1967–2022
Distribution Change
Distribution_change
-5.4% contraction
Population Change
Population Change
26% decrease 1996/97–2021/22
Distribution Change
Distribution_change
2.2% expansion

Identification

Curated resources to aid in the identification of Coot

ID Videos

This section features BTO training videos headlining this species, or featuring it as a potential confusion species.

Coot & Moorhen

Songs and Calls

Listen to example recordings of the main vocalisations of Coot, provided by xeno-canto contributors.

Song:

Call:

Alarm call:

Flight call:

Begging call:

Young call:

Movement

Information about Coot movements and migration based on online bird portals (e.g. BirdTrack), Ringing schemes and tracking studies.

Britain & Ireland movement

View a summary of recoveries in the Online Ringing Report

Foreign locations of birds ringed or recovered in Britain & Ireland

Dots show the foreign destinations of birds ringed in Britain & Ireland, and the origins of birds ringed overseas that were subsequently recaptured, resighted or found dead in Britain & Ireland. Dot colours indicate the time of year that the species was present at the location.

  • Winter (Nov-Feb)
  • Spring (Mar-Apr)
  • Summer (May-Jul)
  • Autumn (Aug-Oct)
Foreign locations of birds ringed or recovered in Britain & Ireland

European movements

EuroBirdPortal uses birdwatcher's records, such as those logged in BirdTrack to map the flows of birds as they arrive and depart Europe. See maps for this species here.

The Eurasian-African Migration Atlas shows movements of individual birds ringed or recovered in Europe. See maps for this species here.

Biology

Lifecycle and body size information for Coot, including statistics on nesting, eggs and lifespan based on BTO ringing and nest recording data.

Productivity and Nesting

Nesting timing

Typical (exceptional) number of broods
1(2)

Egg measurements

Typical length x width
52x36 mm
Mass (% shell)
36.5g (9%)

Clutch Size

Typical number
7-5 eggs
Observed minimum and maximum
3-11 eggs

Incubation

Incubation by
Male + Female
Typical duration
24-21 days

Fledging

Type of chick
Precocial, downy
Typical duration
60-55 days
Visit our Trends Explorer for trend graphs and country statistics.

Survival and Longevity

Survival is shown as the proportion of birds surviving from one year to the next and is derived from bird ringing data. It can also be used to estimate how long birds typically live.

View number ringed each year in the Online Ringing Report.

lifespan

Typical life expectancy of bird reaching breeding age
5 years with breeding typically at 2 years
Maximum age from a ringed bird
15 years, 3 months, 13 days (set in 1978)

Survival of adults

All adults
0.701±0.026

Survival of juveniles

All juveniles
0.38±0.06 (in first year)
Visit our Trends Explorer for trend graphs and country statistics.

Biometrics

Wing length and body weights are from live birds (source).

Wing length

Average ±1 std deviation; range and sample size in brackets.
Juvenile
212.7±9.5 mm
(198-228 mm, N=243)
All adults
216.6±9.5 mm
(201-231 mm, N=1052)
Female
206.2±5.8 mm
(196-214 mm, N=242)
Male
223.8±7 mm
(211-235 mm, N=385)

Body weight

Average ±1 std deviation; range and sample size in brackets.
Juvenile
212.7±9.5 mm
(198-228 mm, N=243)
All adults
216.6±9.5 mm
(201-231 mm, N=1052)
Female
206.2±5.8 mm
(196-214 mm, N=242)
Male
223.8±7 mm
(211-235 mm, N=385)
Visit our Trends Explorer for trend graphs and country statistics.

Ring Size

G

Classification, names and codes

Taxonomy, names and species codes for Coot

Classification and Codes

  • Order: Gruiformes
  • Family: Rallidae
  • Scientific name: Fulica atra
  • Authority: Linnaeus, 1758
  • BTO 2-letter code: CO
  • BTO 5-letter code: COOT.
  • Euring code number: 4290

Alternate species names

  • Catalan: fotja comuna
  • Czech: lyska cerná
  • Danish: Blishøne
  • Dutch: Meerkoet
  • Estonian: lauk
  • Finnish: nokikana
  • French: Foulque macroule
  • Gaelic: Lach-bhlàir
  • German: Blässhuhn
  • Hungarian: szárcsa
  • Icelandic: Bleshæna
  • Irish: Cearc Cheannann
  • Italian: Folaga
  • Latvian: laucis
  • Lithuanian: paprastasis laukys
  • Norwegian: Sothøne
  • Polish: lyska (zwyczajna)
  • Portuguese: galeirão
  • Slovak: lyska cierna
  • Slovenian: liska
  • Spanish: Focha común
  • Swedish: sothöna
  • Welsh: Cwtiar
  • English folkname(s): Snysin

Research

Interpretation and scientific publications about Coot from BTO scientists.

Causes of Change and Solutions

Causes of change

There are no demographic trends available for this species and very little evidence regarding the ecological drivers of change.

Further information on causes of change

There is very little information available regarding the demographic or ecological drivers of population change in Coot.

Demographic data are only available for most recent 15 years, corresponding to a period of decline, and indicate that nest failure rate has increased and there has been a corresponding decrease in brood size over this period.

Brinkhof & Cave (1997) conducted a supplementary feeding experiment and found that seasonal variation in offspring production was in essence the result of seasonal variation in food availability. Thus, increases in food supply may have improved breeding success, but there is no evidence to support this.

Work from Finland (Ronka et al. 2005) has suggested that Coot are sensitive to overwinter weather: thus it is possible that this species may have benefited from milder winters.

Information about conservation actions

The Coot has been increasing over the long-term and the recent downturn in the trend has been insufficient to prompt alerts on the headline (CBC/BBS) trend, and therefore specific conservation action to benefit this species is not currently required. However, given the slight downturn in the BBS trend, and the fact that alerts have been raised against the WBS/WBBS trends, ongoing monitoring is important and conservation actions may be needed in the future. The continuation of local management actions and policies to maintain and create good quality wetland habitats for wildfowl are likely to benefit this species.

More Evidence

More evidence from Conservation Evidence.com

Partners

Birdfacts is based on data collected by volunteers participating in surveys that are organised and funded by BTO, RSPB, Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, JNCC and other partners.
Find a Species

Search by common or scientific name

Or view the alphabetical list of UK bird species