Great Tit

Great Tit

Parus major
Great Tit, Liz Cutting

Introduction

The Great Tit is a common visitor to garden bird feeders. Outside urban areas, it is primarily a species of scrub and deciduous woodland.

The Great Tit is a striking little bird, with a bluish-green back and a yellow breast divided by a central black stripe. The sexes are similar, but in males the black stripe is more pronounced. It is a vocal species with a huge range of songs and calls; its most familiar is its repeated 'teacher-teacher-teacher' song which can be heard throughout woodlands in spring.

UK Great Tit numbers increased from the 1960s, although they have stablised since about 2010. Great Tits take readily to nest boxes, and lay one (sometimes two) clutches a year. They are primarily insectivorous in summer, but over winter they frequent bird feeders and are often found in mixed flocks with other tit species. They are widespread throughout Britain & Ireland apart from on some islands in northern and western Scotland.

  • Our Trends Explorer gives you the latest insight into how this species' population is changing.
Great Tit, Liz Cutting

Key Stats

Status
Common
Common
Weight
Weight
18.6g
Eggs
Eggs
7-9
BTO Records
BTO Records
9.5m records
Population and distribution stats for:
Population Change
Population Change
82% increase 1967–2022
Population Size
Population Size
2m Territories
Distribution Change
Distribution_change
3.7% expansion

Identification

Curated resources to aid in the identification of Great Tit

ID Videos

This section features BTO training videos headlining this species, or featuring it as a potential confusion species.

GBW: Blue Tit and Great Tit

#BirdSongBasics: Great Tit and Coal Tit

#BirdSongBasics: Blue Tit and Great Tit

Songs and Calls

Listen to example recordings of the main vocalisations of Great Tit, provided by xeno-canto contributors.

Song:

Call:

Begging call:

Movement

Information about Great Tit movements and migration based on online bird portals (e.g. BirdTrack), Ringing schemes and tracking studies.

Britain & Ireland movement

View a summary of recoveries in the Online Ringing Report

Foreign locations of birds ringed or recovered in Britain & Ireland

Dots show the foreign destinations of birds ringed in Britain & Ireland, and the origins of birds ringed overseas that were subsequently recaptured, resighted or found dead in Britain & Ireland. Dot colours indicate the time of year that the species was present at the location.

  • Winter (Nov-Feb)
  • Spring (Mar-Apr)
  • Summer (May-Jul)
  • Autumn (Aug-Oct)
Foreign locations of birds ringed or recovered in Britain & Ireland

European movements

EuroBirdPortal uses birdwatcher's records, such as those logged in BirdTrack to map the flows of birds as they arrive and depart Europe. See maps for this species here.

The Eurasian-African Migration Atlas shows movements of individual birds ringed or recovered in Europe. See maps for this species here.

Biology

Lifecycle and body size information for Great Tit, including statistics on nesting, eggs and lifespan based on BTO ringing and nest recording data.

Productivity and Nesting

Nesting timing

Average (range) fo first clutch laying dates
26 Apr (10 Apr-17 May)
Typical (exceptional) number of broods
1(2)

Egg measurements

Typical length x width
18x14 mm
Mass (% shell)
1.7g (6%)

Clutch Size

Typical number
9-7 eggs
Average ±1 standard deviation
7.94±1.86 eggs
Observed minimum and maximum
2-16 eggs

Incubation

Incubation by
Female
Typical duration
14-13 days
Observed average ±1 standard deviation
13.85±1.29 days
Observed minimum and maximum
12-16 days

Fledging

Type of chick
Altricial, downy
Typical duration
21-18 days
Observed average ±1 standard deviation
18.06±1.96 days
Minimum and maximum
15-21.5 days
N=5175, Source
Visit our Trends Explorer for trend graphs and country statistics.

Survival and Longevity

Survival is shown as the proportion of birds surviving from one year to the next and is derived from bird ringing data. It can also be used to estimate how long birds typically live.

View number ringed each year in the Online Ringing Report.

lifespan

Typical life expectancy of bird reaching breeding age
3 years with breeding typically at 1 year
Maximum age from a ringed bird
10 years, 5 months, 18 days (set in 2006)

Survival of adults

All adults
0.542±0.011
Females
0.555±0.034
Males
0.583±0.028

Survival of juveniles

All juveniles
0.38±0.014 (in first year)
Visit our Trends Explorer for trend graphs and country statistics.

Biometrics

Wing length and body weights are from live birds (source).

Wing length

Average ±1 std deviation; range and sample size in brackets.
Juvenile
74.5±2.1 mm
(71-78 mm, N=34300)
All adults
75±3.8 mm
(71-79 mm, N=53986)
Female
73.5±1.8 mm
(71-76 mm, N=26096)
Male
76.5±4.7 mm
(73-79 mm, N=27388)

Body weight

Average ±1 std deviation; range and sample size in brackets.
Juvenile
74.5±2.1 mm
(71-78 mm, N=34300)
All adults
75±3.8 mm
(71-79 mm, N=53986)
Female
73.5±1.8 mm
(71-76 mm, N=26096)
Male
76.5±4.7 mm
(73-79 mm, N=27388)
Visit our Trends Explorer for trend graphs and country statistics.

Ring Size

A or B (pulli B)

Classification, names and codes

Taxonomy, names and species codes for Great Tit

Classification and Codes

  • Order: Passeriformes
  • Family: Paridae
  • Scientific name: Parus major
  • Authority: Linnaeus, 1758
  • BTO 2-letter code: GT
  • BTO 5-letter code: GRETI
  • Euring code number: 14640

Alternate species names

  • Catalan: mallerenga carbonera
  • Czech: sýkora konadra
  • Danish: Musvit
  • Dutch: Koolmees
  • Estonian: rasvatihane
  • Finnish: talitiainen
  • French: Mésange charbonnière
  • Gaelic: Currac-baintighearna
  • German: Kohlmeise
  • Hungarian: széncinege
  • Icelandic: Flotmeisa
  • Irish: Meantán Mór
  • Italian: Cinciallegra
  • Latvian: liela zilite
  • Lithuanian: didžioji zyle
  • Norwegian: Kjøttmeis
  • Polish: bogatka (zwyczajna)
  • Portuguese: chapim-real
  • Slovak: sýkorka velká
  • Slovenian: velika sinica
  • Spanish: Carbonero común
  • Swedish: talgoxe
  • Welsh: Titw Mawr
  • English folkname(s): Titmouse

Research

Interpretation and scientific publications about Great Tit from BTO scientists.

Causes of Change and Solutions

Causes of change

Demographic trends in breeding parameters do not suggest that increases in this species are due to improvements in breeding performance. There is some evidence, albeit limited, that improvements in survival rates, due to amelioration in wintering conditions, may have been responsible. Evidence for ecological drivers of the population increase is limited but increased provisioning in gardens and milder winters may have played a role.

Further information on causes of change

The number of fledglings per breeding attempt have decreased alongside decreases in clutch and brood sizes (see above). Daily failure rates at the egg stage have also decreased but daily failure rates at the chick stage has not changed. Consequently, breeding success does not contribute substantially to population change, and integrated modelling confirms that variation in adult survival is the primary driver of annual population change (Robinson et al. 2014).

Increases in survival rates, due to more widespread food provision in gardens during winter is one possible explanation for the increase (Plummer et al. 2019). Horak & Lebreton (1998) found that survival rates in Estonia were higher in urban populations than rural ones and suggested that this was partly due to supplementary feeding in gardens. Increasing winter temperature may have also played a role. Ahola et al. (2009) suggested that, for their study population in Sweden, increasingly favourable conditions in winters have enhanced the survival rates of Great Tit and resulted in the observed increase in Great Tit breeding density.

Other factors are also likely to influence survival rates. There is some evidence that the beech crop may be influential and it has been shown that survival rates can be related to beechmast production (Verhulst 1992, Perdeck et al. 2000), although there is no evidence that beechmast production has gone up. Perdeck et al. (2000) provided further evidence for this as supplemental food increased survival of both juveniles and adults, supporting the winter-food limitation hypothesis. In a Finnish population, Orell (1989) reported that the high survival rates of resident juveniles after a warm August may be attributable to food availability during the time when the birds undergo their post-juvenile moult.

Great Tits have advanced their laying date, in line with climatic change. This has been found by several studies (e.g. Sanz 2002, Visser et al. 2009, Bauer et al. 2010), but does not seem to be influencing the population trend. Intraspecific competition may also drive population changes in Great tits (Gamelon et al. 2019), and there is evidence that density-dependent effects influence clutch size, hatching success and fledging success, which may explain the decreases observed in clutch size as fledging rates as the population has increased (Bodey et al. 2020). Severe weather events are expected to become more frequent as a result of climate change and conditions such as heavy and persistent rainfall can also be an important driver of Great Tit breeding success (Scholl et al. 2020); however, there is no evidence that this has driven population change.

Information about conservation actions

Like its close relative the Blue Tit, the population of this species has increased since the 1970s, hence it is not a species of concern and no conservation actions are currently required. However, it has experienced a shallow decline over the last ten years and therefore ongoing monitoring would be prudent.

Ongoing provision of garden bird food is likely to continue to benefit the Great Tit. However, the effects are not always entirely positive and feeders may contribute to the spread of avian pox, so those providing food should ensure they follow good hygiene practices. The provision of nest boxes, both in gardens and elsewhere, is also likely to continue to benefit this species.

Publications (7)

Temporal avoidance as a means of reducing competition between sympatric species

Author: Maziarz, M., Broughton, R.K., Beck, K.B., Robinson, R.A. & Sheldon, B.C.

Published: 2023

Human activities modify the availability of natural resources for other species, including birds, and may alter the relationships between them. The provision of supplementary food at garden feeding stations, for example, might favour some species over others and change the competitive balance between them. This paper investigates the behavioural responses to competition of the Marsh Tit, a species that is subordinate to both the Blue Tit and the Great Tit.

24.05.23

Papers

View this paper online

Evidence that rural wintering populations supplement suburban breeding populations

Author: Hanmer, H.J., Dadam, D. & Siriwardena, G.M.

Published: 2022

Urban areas can and do hold significant populations of birds, but we know surprisingly little about how these populations are connected with those present within the wider countryside. It has been suggested that the populations using these different habitats may be linked through seasonal movements, with individuals breeding in rural areas moving into urban sites during the winter months to exploit the supplementary food provided at garden feeding stations. However, little work has been done to test this hypothesis.

24.11.22

Papers Bird Study

View this paper online

The effects of a decade of agri-environment intervention in a lowland farm landscape on population trends of birds and butterflies

Author: Redhead, J.W., Hinsley, S.A., Botham, M.S., Broughton, R.K., Freeman, S.N., Bellamy, P.E., Siriwardena, G., Randle, Z., Nowakowski, M., Heard, M.S. & Pywell, R.F.

Published: 2022

Food production and wildlife conservation are often thought of as incompatible goals, and it is rare that conservation studies consider both economics and long-term changes in ecology. However, a decade-long study at a commercial arable farm in Buckinghamshire has found that agri-environment schemes significantly increased local bird and butterfly populations without damaging food production, offering hope for the UK’s farmland birds and butterflies. 

01.08.22

Papers

Tritrophic phenological match-mismatch in space and time

Author: Burgess M.D., Smith K.W., Evans K.L., Leech D., Pearce-Higgins J.W., Branston C.J., Briggs K., Clark J.R., du Feu C.R., Lewthwaite K., Nager R.G., Sheldon B.C., Smith J.A., Whytock R.C., Willis S.G., Phillimore A.B.

Published: 2018

The increasing temperatures associated with a changing climate may disrupt ecological systems, including by affecting the timing of key events. If events within different trophic levels are affected in different ways then this can lead to what is known as phenological mismatch. But what is the evidence for trophic mismatch, and are there spatial or temporal patterns within the UK that might point to mismatch as a driver of regional declines in key insect-eating birds?

23.04.18

Papers

Health hazards to wild birds and risk factors associated with anthropogenic food provisioning

Author: Lawson, B., Robinson, R. A., Toms, M. P., Risely, R., MacDonald, S., Cunningham, A. A.

Published: 2018

Work on emerging infectious diseases and garden birds in the UK has been supported by citizen science projects, most notably Garden BirdWatch, Garden Wildlife Health and the Garden Bird Health Initiative – the latter now superseded by Garden Wildlife Health. Through these schemes, researchers have been able to carry out national surveillance of emerging diseases, including finch trichomonosis, Paridae pox and passerine salmonellosis. This paper, part of a special issue of Philosophical Transactions focusing on wildlife disease issues, reviews the work that has been carried out on these diseases over the past 25 years. It also takes a look at the occurrence of mycotoxin contamination of food residues in bird feeders, which also pose a risk to the health of wild birds.

12.03.18

Papers

More Evidence

More evidence from Conservation Evidence.com

Partners

Birdfacts is based on data collected by volunteers participating in surveys that are organised and funded by BTO, RSPB, Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, JNCC and other partners.
Find a Species

Search by common or scientific name

Or view the alphabetical list of UK bird species