Swift

Swift

Apus apus

Introduction

Swift is the long-distance migrant most associated with people, as it chooses to nest amongst our urban dwellings.

We await the return of Swifts to Britain and Ireland in early May and they are given the accolade of bringing the summer with them. Written about in poetry and prose, the dark scythe-winged silhouettes of Swifts wheeling about in a blue sky are often accompanied by their screaming calls.

Although widespread across much of Britain & Ireland, Breeding Bird Survey data have documented a significant decline in their populations. The reasons for these losses are likely to include poor summer weather, a decline in their insect food and continued loss of suitable nesting sites.

  • Our Trends Explorer gives you the latest insight into how this species' population is changing.

Key Stats

Status
Common
Common
Weight
Weight
39.5g
Eggs
Eggs
2-3
BTO Records
BTO Records
720k records
Population and distribution stats for:
Population Change
Population Change
66% decrease 1995–2022
Distribution Change
Distribution_change
-4% contraction
Population Size
Population Size
No current data
Distribution Change
Distribution_change
-100% contraction

Identification

Curated resources to aid in the identification of Swift

ID Videos

This section features BTO training videos headlining this species, or featuring it as a potential confusion species.

Hirundines & Swift

GBW: Swift, Swallow and House Martin

Songs and Calls

Listen to example recordings of the main vocalisations of Swift, provided by xeno-canto contributors.

Call:

Flight call:

Movement

Information about Swift movements and migration based on online bird portals (e.g. BirdTrack), Ringing schemes and tracking studies.

Britain & Ireland movement

View a summary of recoveries in the Online Ringing Report

Foreign locations of birds ringed or recovered in Britain & Ireland

Dots show the foreign destinations of birds ringed in Britain & Ireland, and the origins of birds ringed overseas that were subsequently recaptured, resighted or found dead in Britain & Ireland. Dot colours indicate the time of year that the species was present at the location.

  • Winter (Nov-Feb)
  • Spring (Mar-Apr)
  • Summer (May-Jul)
  • Autumn (Aug-Oct)
Foreign locations of birds ringed or recovered in Britain & Ireland

European movements

EuroBirdPortal uses birdwatcher's records, such as those logged in BirdTrack to map the flows of birds as they arrive and depart Europe. See maps for this species here.

The Eurasian-African Migration Atlas shows movements of individual birds ringed or recovered in Europe. See maps for this species here.

Biology

Lifecycle and body size information for Swift, including statistics on nesting, eggs and lifespan based on BTO ringing and nest recording data.

Productivity and Nesting

Nesting timing

Typical (exceptional) number of broods
1

Egg measurements

Typical length x width
25x16 mm
Mass (% shell)
3.5g (6%)

Clutch Size

Typical number
3-2 eggs
Observed minimum and maximum
1-4 eggs

Incubation

Incubation by
-
Typical duration
24-18 days

Fledging

Type of chick
Altricial, naked
Typical duration
56-37 days
Visit our Trends Explorer for trend graphs and country statistics.

Survival and Longevity

Survival is shown as the proportion of birds surviving from one year to the next and is derived from bird ringing data. It can also be used to estimate how long birds typically live.

View number ringed each year in the Online Ringing Report.

lifespan

Typical life expectancy of bird reaching breeding age
9 years with breeding typically at 4 years
Maximum age from a ringed bird
17 years, 11 months, 5 days (set in 1999)

Survival of adults

All adults
0.808
Visit our Trends Explorer for trend graphs and country statistics.

Biometrics

Wing length and body weights are from live birds (source).

Wing length

Average ±1 std deviation; range and sample size in brackets.
Juvenile
169.3±6.6 mm
(157-177 mm, N=99)
All adults
175.1±3.7 mm
(169-181 mm, N=2130)
Female
174±4.1 mm
(168-181 mm, N=143)
Male
176.2±3.3 mm
(170-181 mm, N=57)

Body weight

Average ±1 std deviation; range and sample size in brackets.
Juvenile
169.3±6.6 mm
(157-177 mm, N=99)
All adults
175.1±3.7 mm
(169-181 mm, N=2130)
Female
174±4.1 mm
(168-181 mm, N=143)
Male
176.2±3.3 mm
(170-181 mm, N=57)
Visit our Trends Explorer for trend graphs and country statistics.

Ring Size

SO

Classification, names and codes

Taxonomy, names and species codes for Swift

Classification and Codes

  • Order: Apodiformes
  • Family: Apodidae
  • Scientific name: Apus apus
  • Authority: Linnaeus, 1758
  • BTO 2-letter code: SI
  • BTO 5-letter code: SWIFT
  • Euring code number: 7950

Alternate species names

  • Catalan: falciot negre
  • Czech: rorýs obecný
  • Danish: Mursejler
  • Dutch: Gierzwaluw
  • Estonian: piiritaja e. piirpääsuke
  • Finnish: tervapääsky
  • French: Martinet noir
  • Gaelic: Gobhlan-mòr
  • German: Mauersegler
  • Hungarian: sarlósfecske
  • Icelandic: Múrsvölungur
  • Irish: Gabhlán Gaoithe
  • Italian: Rondone comune
  • Latvian: svire
  • Lithuanian: juodasis ciurlys
  • Norwegian: Tårnseiler
  • Polish: jerzyk (zwyczajny)
  • Portuguese: andorinhão-preto
  • Slovak: dáždovník obycajný
  • Slovenian: hudournik
  • Spanish: Vencejo común
  • Swedish: tornseglare
  • Welsh: Gwennol Ddu
  • English folkname(s): Devil Bird, Martlett

Research

Interpretation and scientific publications about Swift from BTO scientists.

Causes of Change and Solutions

Causes of change

The causes of the decline are unclear, although a recent analysis of BTO monitoring data (Finch et al. 2023) suggests that changes in juvenile (but not adult) survival are the most likely driver of the decline.

Further information on causes of change

Analysis of phenological change suggests that Swifts both arrive and depart in the UK earlier than in the 1960s, with the length of stay consequently remaining unchanged (Newson et al. 2016). Low juvenile survival appeared to be associated with poor weather conditions (Finch et al. 2023), implying a reduction in availability of aerial insects was causing additional mortality. Modern building design and refurbishment of old buildings are likely also have contributed to the decline by depriving Swifts of nest sites, but the complications in monitoring trends and nests (as described in the Status Summary) make it difficult to confirm the primary drivers of change.

Information about conservation actions

This species is difficult to monitor and hence the main drivers of the decline are uncertain. Given confirming the cause of decline is challenging and likely to remain so for some time, it would be prudent to take some precautionary actions whilst research is ongoing.Provision of additional nesting space to counter any reductions in availability of nest sites as a result of modern building designs and refurbishment of older buildings, either in the form of Swift nestboxes and Swift bricks which can be integrated into new buildings and renovations, as supported by Action for Swifts, Swift Conservationand similar organisations, are a relatively straightforward and inexpensive conservation action which can be taken by local groups and individuals, and can also be incorporated into wider development planning. Swifts are known to use these artificial nests (e.g. Schaub et al.2015). The availability of nest sites could also be increased on a wider scale by implementing policies or regulations which encourage or legislate the provision of nest boxes or Swift bricks on new buildings. Swift Towers are another option which have been used in Europe. Further information and advice about providing boxes and attracting Swifts to them is available on the Swift Conservationwebsite.

Swifts can forage over an extremely wide area during the breeding season, so other conservation actions such as habitat management in the vicinity of nest sites (to attempt to increase the availability of prey) are unlikely to be successful, unless they can be undertaken on a wider landscape scale. Whilst actions to increase levels of invertebrates across the wider countryside may benefit Swifts, further research is required, both to confirm whether changes to invertebrate abundance might be a cause of the Swift decline, and if so to identify the habitats which will provide the optimal requirements for foraging Swifts.

Publications (7)

Spatial variation in spring arrival patterns of Afro-Palearctic bird migration across Europe

Author: Border, J.A., Boersch-Supan, P., Pearce-Higgins, J.W., Hewson, C., Howard, C., Stephens, P.A., Willis, S.G., Houston, A., Gargallo, G. & Baillie, S.R.

Published: 2024

The timing of migrant birds’ arrival on the breeding grounds, or spring arrival, can affect their survival and breeding success. The optimal time for spring arrival involves trade-offs between various factors, including the availability of food and suitable breeding habitat, and the risks of severe weather. Due to climate change, the timing of spring emergence has advanced for many plants and insects which affects the timing of maximum food availability for migratory birds in turn. The degree to which different bird species can adapt to this varies. Understanding the factors that influence spring arrival in different species can help us to predict how they may respond to future changes in climate.

02.05.24

Papers

Birds of Conservation Concern Wales 4: the population status of birds in Wales

Author: Johnstone, I.G., Hughes, J., Balmer, D.E., Brenchley, A., Facey, R.J., Lindley, P.J., Noble, D.G. & Taylor, R.C.

Published: 2022

The latest review of the conservation status of birds in Wales. The report assessed all 220 bird species which regularly occur in Wales. There are now 60 species of bird on the Red List, with 91 on the Amber List and just 69 - less than a third of the total number of species - on the Green List.

06.12.22

Reports Birds of Conservation Concern

View a summary report

Demography of Common Swifts Apus apus breeding in the UK associated with local weather but not aphid abundance

Author: Finch, T., Bell, J.R., Robinson, R.A. & Peach, W.J.

Published: 2022

Data from the BTO/JNCC/RSPB Breeding Birds Survey reveal that breeding Swift populations in the UK are in decline. Both reductions in the availability of invertebrate prey and the loss of nesting sites have been suggested as possible reasons, but the ultimate drivers of this decline are poorly understood. Can we improve our understanding of Swift decline by bringing together the information collected by bird ringers and nest recorders alongside data on insect availability and weather?

03.11.22

Papers

A 30,000-km journey by Apus apus pekinensis tracks arid lands between northern China and south-western Africa

Author: Zhao, Y., Zhao, X., Wu, L., Mu, T., Yu, F., Kearsley, L., Liang, X., Fu, J., Hou, X., Peng, P., Li, X., Zhang, T., Yan, S., Newell, D., Hewson, C. M., Townshend, T., Åkesson, S., and Liu, Y.

Published: 2022

The Swift is widely distributed with a cross-continental breeding range spanning Europe and large parts of Asia and north Africa. Until recently, Swift migration research has focussed on populations which breed in Europe and north-western Africa (the apus subspecies), leaving the migration of birds breeding throughout Asia (the pekinensis subspecies) shrouded in mystery.

29.06.22

Papers

The status of our bird populations: the fifth Birds of Conservation Concern in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man and second IUCN Red List assessment of extinction risk for Great Britain

Author: Stanbury, A.J., Eaton, M.A., Aebischer, N.J., Balmer, D., Brown, A.F., Douse, A., Lindley, P., McCulloch, N., Noble, D.G. & Win, I.

Published: 2021

Commonly referred to as the UK Red List for birds, this is the fifth review of the status of birds in the UK, Channel Islands and Isle of Man, published in December 2021 as Birds of Conservation Concern 5 (BOCC5). This updates the last assessment in 2015. Using standardised criteria, experts from a range of bird NGOs, including BTO, assessed 245 species with breeding, passage or wintering populations in the UK and assigned each to the Red, Amber or Green Lists of conservation concern. 

01.12.21

Reports Birds of Conservation Concern

Download PDF

Evolution of chain migration in an aerial insectivorous bird, the Common Swift Apus apus

Author: Åkesson, S., Atkinson, P.W., Bermejo, A., de la Puente, J., Ferri, M., Hewson, C.M., Holmgren, J., Kaiser, E., Kearsley, L., Klaassen, R.H.G., Kolunen, H., Matsson, G., Minelli, F., Norevik, G., Pietiäinen, H., Singh, N.J., Spina, F., Viktora, L. & Hedenström, A.

Published: 2020

The highly aerial Common Swift Apus apus, which spends the non‐breeding period on the wing, has been found to exhibit a rarely‐found chain migration pattern.

04.09.20

Papers

Identification of putative wintering areas and ecological determinants of population dynamics of Common House-Martin Delichon urbicum and Common Swift Apus apus breeding in Northern Italy

Author: Ambrosini, R., Orioli, V., Massimino, D. & Bani, L.

Published: 2011

To identify the causes of population decline in migratory birds, researchers must determine the relative influence of environmental changes on population dynamics while the birds are on breeding grounds, wintering grounds, and en route between the two. This is problematic when the wintering areas of specific populations are unknown. Here, we first identified the putative wintering areas of Common House-Martin (Delichon urbicum) and Common Swift (Apus apus) populations breeding in northern Italy as those areas, within the wintering ranges of these species, where the winter Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), which may affect winter survival, best predicted annual variation in population indices observed in the breeding grounds in 1992–2009. In these analyses, we controlled for the potentially confounding effects of rainfall in the breeding grounds during the previous year, which may affect reproductive success; the North Atlantic Oscillation Index (NAO), which may account for climatic conditions faced by birds during migration; and the linear and squared term of year, which account for nonlinear population trends. The areas thus identified ranged from Guinea to Nigeria for the Common House-Martin, and were located in southern Ghana for the Common Swift. We then regressed annual population indices on mean NDVI values in the putative wintering areas and on the other variables, and used Bayesian model averaging (BMA) and hierarchical partitioning (HP) of variance to assess their relative contribution to population dynamics. We re-ran all the analyses using NDVI values at different spatial scales, and consistently found that our population of Common House-Martin was primarily affected by spring rainfall (43%–47.7% explained variance) and NDVI (24%–26.9%), while the Common Swift population was primarily affected by the NDVI (22.7%–34.8%). Although these results must be further validated, currently they are the only hypotheses about the wintering grounds of the Italian populations of these species, as no Common House-Martin and Common Swift ringed in Italy have been recovered in their wintering ranges.

01.01.11

Papers

More Evidence

More evidence from Conservation Evidence.com

Partners

Birdfacts is based on data collected by volunteers participating in surveys that are organised and funded by BTO, RSPB, Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, JNCC and other partners.
Find a Species

Search by common or scientific name

Or view the alphabetical list of UK bird species