Supplementary bird feeding as an overlooked contribution to local phosphorus cycles.

Supplementary bird feeding as an overlooked contribution to local phosphorus cycles.

Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2024

Citation

Abraham, A., Doughty, C., Plummer, K. & Duvall, E. 2024. Supplementary bird feeding as an overlooked contribution to local phosphorus cycles. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 22: doi:/10.1002/fee.2793
Pheasant, by Sarah Kelman / BTO
Pheasant, by Sarah Kelman / BTO

Overview

Putting out food for wild birds at garden feeding stations is a common practice, and one of a number of different forms of providing supplementary food to free-living birds. Another is the provision of grain and growers pellets by game managers to support Pheasants and other gamebirds post release. The act of putting out supplementary food may have wider effects on our ecosystems because of the nutrients present in the food, as this piece of research reveals.

In more detail

The seeds, grains and nuts that make up the supplementary food provided to birds at feeding stations are typically imported to the sites where they are used, and may have been grown many hundreds or even thousands of kilometres away. Bird feed is rich in phosphorus, which plays a key role in animal health and ecosystem integrity, but additional phosphorus inputs to natural systems could adversely impact ecosystem function, including through the eutrophication of waterbodies or changes to vegetation structure.

In an attempt to understand the possible impact of this transfer of phosphorus – from the rock deposits from which it is mined, through its use to fertilise the crops that produce the seeds which end up at bird feeding stations – the research team calculated the likely quantities involved for garden bird feeding and gamebird rearing here in the UK. By establishing the average phosphorus concentrations in the foods commonly used for feeding birds, it was possible to calculate figures for the types of foods provided for feeding garden birds and gamebirds.

Average phosphorus concentration was highest in the growers pellets fed to gamebirds and lowest in wheat supplement (also fed to Pheasants), with wild bird seed mixes in between the two. Using published figures for the quantities of these foods used in the UK – 150,000 tonnes of wild bird seed mixes, 282,000 tonnes of wheat supplement and 92,000 tonnes of growers pellets – gave an estimated figure of total phosphorus supply in these foods of 2.4 kilotonnes per year. 

To put this into perspective, the UK’s phosphorus budget is largely driven by imported fertiliser for agriculture (82.6 kilotonnes per year) and feed for domestic livestock (45.0 kilotonnes per year). This indicates that the phosphorus transported from bird feeders to agricultural landscapes in the UK likely has little impact. However, where birds are transporting this phosphorus into non-farmed landscapes (such as woodlands) the impact may be more significant. Given that the foods used to support gamebird releases make up the larger share of this contribution, and because gamebirds tend to be fed within woodland habitats, this is the pathway more likely to impact our woodland ecosystems.

By taking their ‘best’ estimate, and assuming that the phosphorus input from bird feed – via birds – is equally dispersed across the UK, the researchers suggest that this additional input is equivalent to 0.01 grams per metre squared per year. This figure is roughly half that of the quantities of phosphorus deposited from the atmosphere in the UK.

What this research, and indeed other recent BTO work, demonstrates is that we need to be mindful of the full range of possible impacts from feeding birds. This work fills in another piece of that puzzle, so we can better assess the benefits and costs of provisioning birds.

Abstract

Supplementary feeding of garden birds and gamebirds is a common practice worldwide. Bird feed is rich in phosphorus (P), which plays a key role in animal health and ecosystem function. However, much of the P in bird feed originates from mined rock deposits, which is then transported thousands of kilometers to feeder stations, where it represents an external source of nutrients for recipient ecosystems. Here, we demonstrate that diffusion of P by birds and other animals from feeder stations to ecosystems can represent a nontrivial contribution to local biogeochemical cycles. Using the UK as a case study, we show that supplementary bird feeding supplies 2.4 (range: 1.9–3.0) gigagrams of P per year across the UK, a flux similar in magnitude to atmospheric deposition. Phosphorus provided to garden birds alone is equal to that supplied through the application of garden fertilizers. In natural and semi-natural ecosystems, additional feeder-derived P inputs may exacerbate eutrophication at the local scale and adversely impact biodiversity.

Thanks for your support

AJA was supported by Horizon Europe Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions grant agreement #101062339; ESD was supported by the Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability's Sustainable Biodiversity Fund and the Athena Fund for Research at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology.

Staff author(s)